Volvo CEO's Bold Claim: Outpacing Legacy Automakers in the Electric Revolution
Uncover the latest automotive breakthroughs with our daily newsletter, delivering the most significant news straight to your inbox, no filler.
The automotive world witnessed a pivotal moment with the unveiling of the 2027 Volvo EX60 (https://www.thedrive.com/news/2027-volvo-ex60-feels-like-a-no-brainer-for-ev-news-with-400-mile-range-and-reasonable-price-tag), signaling Volvo's ambitious foray into the electric era. But the real headline-grabber was Volvo CEO Håkan Samuelsson's confident assertion that their software woes are now a thing of the past.
In a candid round table discussion in Sweden, Samuelsson proclaimed to The Drive, 'We're ahead of the curve, and the rest of the legacy automakers have their work cut out.' This bold statement was directed at traditional car manufacturers, excluding electric pioneers like Tesla and Rivian.
The CEO emphasized the monumental shift in the industry, stating, 'Transitioning from traditional manufacturing to developing an in-house software stack is a massive undertaking.'
The road to this breakthrough wasn't without challenges. Samuelsson reflected, 'It was a grueling process, but we now have a centralized computer system, a game-changer. We can swiftly introduce new features and fix issues without relying on external parties.'
Volvo's Chief Strategy and Product Officer, Michael Fleiss, echoed this sentiment, 'The EX90 is a software-defined vehicle, a feat Ford attempted and abandoned, while Volkswagen is still striving for. Volvo has accomplished it.'
Fleiss further explained, 'It was a lengthy endeavor, but we've successfully developed software-defined vehicles, a rare achievement among legacy OEMs. The EX90's software issues are now resolved with the latest update, and we're thrilled to launch the SPA3, our second software-defined vehicle.'
The Volvo executive team openly acknowledged the challenges faced with the EX90, with Fleiss stating, 'Our customers endured quality issues with the EX90, which led to a two-year delay in our plans. We're committed to transparency about these experiences.'
Chief Engineering and Technology Officer, Anders Bell, shared the hardships, 'It was an incredibly challenging journey, but we persevered. Regrettably, our customers bore the brunt of these issues.'
Bell candidly admitted, 'Internal struggles are acceptable, but our customers shouldn't suffer. Thankfully, our vehicles, including the flagships, are now stable.'
When asked about lessons learned, Bell suggested, 'Starting sooner would have been beneficial.' He described the process of creating an in-house software stack for a software-defined vehicle as an intimidating challenge.
Have insider knowledge about automakers' behind-the-scenes struggles? Share it with us at tips@thedrive.com. But here's the controversial part: Are Volvo's claims of superiority over other legacy automakers justified? Share your thoughts in the comments, and let's spark a respectful debate!
